News
I’d listen to Jojo Siwa’s torturous cover of Bette Davis Eyes on repeat for Caz, and Saffie’s purple and yellow pleated dress ...
2d
Screen Rant on MSNThe 14-Year-Old Taylor Swift Cover That's Blowing Up Thanks To A Massive ControversyA Taylor Swift cover from 14 years ago is having a resurgence after a recent controversy thrust her performance back into the spotlight.
JoJo Siwa has seen your “Bette Davis Eyes” videos.
Kim Carnes—the original singer of "Bette Davis Eyes"—shared her honest thoughts on JoJo Siwa's cover of the 1981 hit, saying ...
5d
Extra.ie on MSNJoJo Siwa to open European tour in Dublin this SeptemberThe tour will hit Dublin, Glasgow, Manchester, Newcastle, London, Brighton, Birmingham, Cardiff, Paris, Cologne and Warsaw. JoJo Siwa has announced a headline show at The Academy, Dublin on September ...
6d
PinkNews on MSNKim Carnes says JoJo Siwa’s ‘Bette Davis Eyes’ cover is ‘a bit too close’ to originalKim Carnes has spoken out about JoJo Siwa’s cover of her 1981 hit, “Bette Davis Eyes”, and she thinks it’s “a bit too close” to the original. Last week, the former Dance Moms star released her cover ...
Kim Carnes, the original singer of “Bette Davis Eyes,” is finally sharing her thoughts on JoJo Siwa’s hoarse-throated trad-wife-inspired cover. And let’s just say the keeper of this unofficial queer ...
Kim Carnes described JoJo Siwa’s new cover version of “Bette Davis Eyes” as too close to her 1981 hit in July 2025.
7d
EarlyGame on MSNKim Carnes Calls Out Jojo Siwa's ‘Bette Davis Eyes' Cover: "There Is A Difference Between Singing A Song … And Embodying It"JoJo Siwa's recent controversial cover of the 1981 hit "Bette Davis Eyes" has been criticised by none other than Kim Carnes, the original singer. In a now-deleted Instagram Reel, Carnes suggested that ...
The original artist behind the 1981 hit “Bette Davis Eyes” seemingly had something to say about JoJo Siwa’s cover in a ...
JoJo Siwa covering Kim Carnes' song comes on the heels of her canceling her Pride performance and declaring that she was ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results